قرآن میں غیر عربی الفاظ سے متعلق استشراقی نقطۂ نظر: منٹگمری واٹ اور رابرٹ سپنسر کی آراء کا تقابلی جائزہ

Orientalists Views on Foreign Vocabulary of the Qur’an: A Comparative Study of Montgomery Watt and Robert Spencer’s Views

Abstract

This research article examines the perspectives of two prominent Orientalists, Montgomery Watt and Robert Spencer, on the foreign vocabulary of the Qur’an. By conducting a comparative analysis, the study examines how each scholar interprets the Qur'anic vocabulary, particularly the loan words and their impact on the understanding of Islamic texts. Montgomery Watt's approach is characterized by a historical contextual analysis, emphasizing the cultural exchanges between the Arabian Peninsula and neighboring civilizations. In contrast, Robert Spencer's viewpoint often reflects a more critical stance, focusing on perceived inconsistencies and the implications for Islamic theology. This paper aims to highlight the nuanced differences in their methodologies and conclusions, shedding light on how these perspectives shape broader discussions within Islamic studies and contribute to ongoing debates about the Qur’an’s linguistic heritage. Through this comparative study, we seek to gain a deeper understanding of Orientalist scholarship and its influence on modern interpretations of the Qur'an.